This is nothing more than cheap populism to please family rights defenders, nationalists and church addicts. Politicians in Russia cannot imitate their US counterparts by reaffirming that marriage is between a man and a woman – as our Constitutional Court has already done it, so they just found something that people will easily understand and buy before the elections.
One must understand that the issue here has no connection with advocating LGBT rights to minors. Minors are only added here to make the law look more dramatic and necessary in the eyes of the public. The public would not buy this law so easily if it directly said that LGBT rights cannot be advocated in public places. But, because you cannot prevent minors from walking in the streets or any public place, this law means de facto that LGBT activists will not be able to organise any public events as, by definition, a public event takes place ... in public.
No Gay Pride, no LGBT rights protest, no open Gay cultural festival, no LGBT film festival and no distribution of leaflets in the streets. But that's not all.
More worrying is that wearing a T-shirt "I am gay", sticking a rainbow pin on a sweater or walking with rainbow balloons in the streets could also fall under this new law as it is a kind of propaganda. How judges will interpret this law in the future, we don't know. What we know is what we have already experienced for the past six years: Russian judges are very creative when it comes to preventing LGBT people from organising any Pride march or other public action. And they do not need a new law for that.
Cheap populism – this is what this law is. Once the law is voted in the final reading, St Petersburg will be the third region in the country to restrict the freedom of expression of those who are already, as of today, second class citizens.
Let's put it straight. LGBT people pay taxes, they are given the right to vote for Putin (note that if they abstain, someone will cast the vote on their behalf) but they have no right to freedom of assembly, to start a family or to be protected from discrimination based on their sexual orientation. And now, little by little, region after region, LGBT people are being deprived of their right to freedom of expression. Perhaps this is the most emblematic.
Ironically, the only right gays earned since the decriminalisation of male same-sex intercourse in 1993 is the right to donate blood. In essence, LGBT people can give to society, whether cash or blood – or both if possible – but they don't get anything back from society and cannot be part of it.
And most Russians are fine with this situation because, after all LGBT, people are a minority. But the majority often forgets that it is nothing else than a patchwork of minorities. Russia is based on the rule of the majority because Russian society is based on the rule of the strongest. The rich are higher than the law, the strong are first to be served in the queue. The Muscovites enjoy better infrastructures than those in the regions. And so on ...
To understand the reasons, those in the West or overseas must remember that Russia has never been a democracy.
In this country, you are taken seriously only if you constantly show your teeth. If you are too kind, people will not respect you simply because they will not be impressed by you. The basis is fear and not diplomacy.
As Russian politicians like to tell us: "Go to the Gay Parade in Berlin, but not on our sacred land". If you are Russian and gay, lesbian, bi or trans, you can only enjoy your human rights abroad.
And this is the problem.
Russia is not a sacred land, or if it is, then my understanding of the Constitution is wrong. Russia is not the Orthodox state that some would like to see. Russia is a secular state where the President does not swear on the
Bible and where there is a separation of power between the church and the State.
In today's Russia the attempts to re-criminalise homosexuality, or to prevent its "propaganda", is driven by "morality" and religion. And this IS new.
When Stalin criminalised male same-sex relations in 1934, his idea was at first to have in hands a law he could use against any of his political opponents. His move was not conducted by personal religious believes. But things have changed and this is scary. Now, gays are targeted for what they are and not because they could be a way to target others.
This law is a shame for Russia and a shame for St Petersburg, a city which aims to portray itself more liberal than the Capital.
This law also proved to be unnecessary because no one has attempted to organise Gay Pride events or any large scale "propaganda" of LGBT rights – neither in Ryazan nor in Arkhangelsk.
Perhaps we should think about who this law will really affect. In other words, how many people this law will put at risk the day it comes into force?
I will probably be one of the first as I will not keep silent and go to protest in the streets. But how many of us will really be charged?
Ironically, the first anti-gay law passed in Ryazan in 2006 has so far seen two individuals charged – Nikolai Baev and Irina Fet when we all went from Moscow to Ryazan to campaign against this law in 2009. Since then, no-one suffered from it. So why is that?
This ban will affect only a handful of LGBT people, simply because the LGBT community as a whole does not care about its rights.
And why is that? Not because there are no LGBT people in these regions, but simply because most are indifferent.
Russia has a population of 143 million. So you can estimate that there are a few million LGBT people, depending if you apply a ratio of 5 or 10 percent, but ultimately, there are no more than 50 to 100 people really active, ready to organise something across the country. Even if I add those who think that activism equates comments they left on blogs, the total number would not go much higher than 500.
When we take the streets – anywhere in Russia – we fail to attract more than 30 people. Russian LGBTs are not American LGBTs of Harvey Milk's time. Keep this is mind.
Our Russian LGBT people are aware of their sexual orientation when they dance in a club, drink in a bar, look around in a sauna, create their profile in a dating site or travel to Sitges, Mykonos and the Canaries, for the more wealthy.
In every other situation, they do not need to affirm themselves. They do not need any rights. Their primary needs –whether it is eating, dating or sex – hav no connection with their identity. Or at least, this is what they think. But their lack of motivation to defend their rights is not an act of cowardice; it is an absence of long term vision. As some start to wake up in St. Petersburg to fight this law which will soon directly affect them, others will probably wake up when Russia re-criminalises homosexuality. Then, it will be too late.
The best proof is that the same people who wake up today in St Petersburg kept their silence when similar laws were implemented in two other regions in the past five years.
A recent incident in St. Petersburg says it all.
Marc Almond, a British gay singer recently said, during a press conference of a LGBT Film Festival in St Petersburg where he appeared as a guest star, that public actions are not necessary for LGBT people. He suggested that Gay Prides are not necessary.
This is a wide sentiment among LGBT people. We do not need to appear publicly, we do not need to be out, and we do not need to show that we are just as good as others.
It's a mistake. And the result of such mistake can be seen today in St Petersburg and most likely tomorrow in other regions where other politicians need to earn a bit of fame on our backs.
What Almond failed to understand is that if he returns next year to the city, he will have to show-up to a private festival and will not be able to express himself in a public press conference.
Russia is just a one-day trip for Almond who is lucky to live in the UK, a country where LGBT people enjoy a variety of rights and where everything started ... in the streets during the 70s.
Yes, it always starts in the streets.
Whether it is about gaining fundamental rights or changing regimes, it does start in the streets.
It is a pity that the previous generation of activists in Russia at the beginning of the 90s stopped the fight after they obtained the decriminalisation. From 1994 until 2000, I have no doubt that, in the state of chaos that Russia was experiencing, it would have been easy to organise Pride events and pass anti-discrimination laws. When the Parliament was still representative of the country, there were some discussions around same-sex marriage.
I remember that in 2005 gay businesses in Russia took a very negative view of our Moscow Pride campaigns and, more generally, of all the following LGBT rights campaigns we launched. They thought it would weaken their position.
On our part, we knew that they would be the first to shout if the legislators were about to harm their activities – like raising the VAT on drinks and trunks. They would be in the streets. But cut our rights, and they are silent. However, it does not prevent them earning money from us and levy a "gay" premium on their prices. Yes, we have a "pink rouble".
I remember the times and disputes when we launched the Moscow Pride campaign years ago. They are still on-going today. I heard at that time from some in St Petersburg that the urgency was not to move anything. "Don't provoke, try to discuss with the authorities, try to negotiate, don't sue against their decisions, and most of all be quiet!"
The same who today call for petition against this law in St. Petersburg did not take any action when Ryazan and Arkhangelsk implemented their anti-gay bills. Moreover, they mocked our campaign against it. They could not believe at that time that they would be next and that their approach "not to provoke the authorities" would not protect them on the long term.
Fighting against the authorities gave us the only positive achievement of the last 17 years: the end of the MSM blood ban. On the opposite side, discussing, negotiating and in a way, "sleeping", with the authorities reached no practical result and eventually led today to this anti-gay law.
If the anti-gay law is approved in its final reading, it will come into force quickly. Individuals will face a fine of up to 4,000 roubles – and an organisation up to 40,000 roubles. This is what we could have been subject to when we were arrested last June while staging the Slavic Gay Pride in the city.
Legally speaking, challenging this bill in Russia is a "no go". Though the law is clearly unconstitutional, the Constitutional Court in 2009 reached the opposite view in what will remain one of the most "creative and artistic" decisions in the Court's history. This decision followed an appeal we initiated after the introduction of the first of these laws in the region of Ryazan in 2006. The case is now lodged with the European Court of Human Rights and also with the UN Human Rights Committee.
The truth is that we are powerless. We could be an army but instead, we are a small tribe fighting in opposite directions pursuing different goals while things are falling apart around us.
Begging the European Court of Human Rights to finally open the case, give a decision and then lobbying the Committee of Ministers to enforce it is the only legal answer we have. A lot of work and a process which will at best last for many years.
On your side, you can send tons of letters of protests – and even paralyse the fax machine of St Petersburg's Parliament – it will only energise those who initiated all this process in Parliament.
You cannot be diplomatic with those who do not even respect their own words. Russia signed international conventions that no one forced her to accept. Either the country pulls out from these institutions, or it must respect their rules.
Hit the Russian politicians where it will be painful for them. Ban them from entering the European Union, ban them from entering the United States, suspend Russia's voting rights at the Council of Europe, have your government calling their Russian counterpart to protest. This will highlight the problem.
We do not have the power to ban Russian homophobes from spending their holidays in Nice, Cyprus or Spain – we could only ask the EU to deny them access – and we did make the job easy by publishing a list of homophobic politicians and their resumes.
We do not have the power to suspend Russia's voting rights at the Council of Europe. We could only ask the MPs to do it and help them by providing all the legal means for it.
As I am writing these last few lines, my plane is about to land in Arkhangelsk where I am about to defy the anti-gay law adopted here some weeks ago.
It's gonna be a long process made of several hopeless Court hearings in Russia until it can be logged in the endless queue of appeals to the European Court of Human Rights.
Perhaps one day, when the Court has made up its mind, the "propaganda of homosexuality" will be history – one day.
• This is an abridged version of an article which was first published byUK Gay News. It can be read in full at http://ukgaynews.org.uk/Archive/11/Nov/1601.htm